It may date back further. I can't remember where I first heard that it was a lost VU song, but it may well have been on the old "yellow" VU forum. According to some posts on this current forum, Sal Mercuri posted on the yellow forum about a Warhol recording of the VU doing it in 1966, and I may vaguely remember that post too.bobbydriver wrote: ↑26 Apr 2021 10:28Interesting - didn't know that Kill Yr Sons dated back to the first LP demos
Lou Reed Demos
-
- On the wild side
- Posts: 110
- Joined: 22 May 2004 23:07
Re: Lou Reed Demos
- iaredatsun
- Now jelly rolls in the street
- Posts: 1764
- Joined: 08 Jun 2004 21:38
- Location: London, Texas
Re: Lou Reed Demos
I think they could be released in 1972 as the performing rights expire end of '71, I guess. Is the tape '71?Elvis Plebsley wrote: ↑26 Apr 2021 12:16he owns the tape and the recordings on it, but not the copyright
underground, overground
-
- Head held high
- Posts: 321
- Joined: 05 Aug 2008 22:27
- Location: Berkshire, UK
Re: Lou Reed Demos
It's in the "Unrecorded/Unreleased" list in Nigel Trevena's booklet so that backs up your memory.searchin4mymainline wrote: ↑26 Apr 2021 18:49It may date back further. I can't remember where I first heard that it was a lost VU song, but it may well have been on the old "yellow" VU forum. According to some posts on this current forum, Sal Mercuri posted on the yellow forum about a Warhol recording of the VU doing it in 1966, and I may vaguely remember that post too.bobbydriver wrote: ↑26 Apr 2021 10:28Interesting - didn't know that Kill Yr Sons dated back to the first LP demos
Re: Lou Reed Demos
I have the same memory, possibly from the same source, as in my head I've thought of it for a long time as being a song from roughly the time of the Banana album recording, but that might well be only the title/some lyrics, rather than the complete song.searchin4mymainline wrote: ↑26 Apr 2021 18:49It may date back further. I can't remember where I first heard that it was a lost VU song, but it may well have been on the old "yellow" VU forum. According to some posts on this current forum, Sal Mercuri posted on the yellow forum about a Warhol recording of the VU doing it in 1966, and I may vaguely remember that post too.bobbydriver wrote: ↑26 Apr 2021 10:28Interesting - didn't know that Kill Yr Sons dated back to the first LP demos
-
- Head held high
- Posts: 419
- Joined: 07 Mar 2004 21:11
Re: Lou Reed Demos
I assume the auction house adds the copyright notice to cover themselves in good faith. The recordings that have already been issued will be covered by copyright in any case. However, the recordings could have been made available surreptitiously to extend copyright. Bowie's estate did this with the Conversation Piece demos. They made them available for streaming on an obscure site for an hour one new years eve and so extended the rights. If I remember rightly, they were also named in ways to avoid searches.iaredatsun wrote: ↑26 Apr 2021 20:55I think they could be released in 1972 as the performing rights expire end of '71, I guess. Is the tape '71?
Re: Lou Reed Demos
The video's been pulled. "This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by SME".
8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1
-
- On the wild side
- Posts: 110
- Joined: 22 May 2004 23:07
Re: Lou Reed Demos
I suspect the 1966 version would be lyrically similar to the 1970 version's anti-war protest song style lyrics, rather than the 1974 lyrics about ECT etc. There are one or two other Lou/VU "protest songs" from around the same time, Prominent Men being one, and probably Men Of Good Fortune, which is also on a 1966 Warhol tape.
-
- Beginning to see the light
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 12 Mar 2020 14:49
Re: Lou Reed Demos
Did anyone download the audio before the video got taken down?
- iaredatsun
- Now jelly rolls in the street
- Posts: 1764
- Joined: 08 Jun 2004 21:38
- Location: London, Texas
Re: Lou Reed Demos
And in such a case as a tape not owned by the estate or a record company, who is extending the copyright on behalf of whom? Reed's estate do not have this tape.Elvis Plebsley wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021 13:16I assume the auction house adds the copyright notice to cover themselves in good faith. The recordings that have already been issued will be covered by copyright in any case. However, the recordings could have been made available surreptitiously to extend copyright. Bowie's estate did this with the Conversation Piece demos. They made them available for streaming on an obscure site for an hour one new years eve and so extended the rights. If I remember rightly, they were also named in ways to avoid searches.iaredatsun wrote: ↑26 Apr 2021 20:55I think they could be released in 1972 as the performing rights expire end of '71, I guess. Is the tape '71?
underground, overground
-
- Head held high
- Posts: 419
- Joined: 07 Mar 2004 21:11
Re: Lou Reed Demos
[quote=iaredatsun
And in such a case as a tape not owned by the estate or a record company, who is extending the copyright on behalf of whom? Reed's estate do not have this tape.
[/quote]
Hasn't it already been mentioned that 2 of the tracks were on
Transformer as bonus tracks?
And in such a case as a tape not owned by the estate or a record company, who is extending the copyright on behalf of whom? Reed's estate do not have this tape.
[/quote]
Hasn't it already been mentioned that 2 of the tracks were on
Transformer as bonus tracks?